Europe’s top soccer league spent 1 billion pounds ($1.5 billion) on player transfers this year. That record for spending came at the expense of the home-grown players coming up with their clubs’ systems, new research suggests.
Across European soccer’s top divisions, fewer than one in five players is playing for the team he came up with, the lowest since Switzerland-based CIES Football Observatory began tracking the data in 2009. In England’s Premier League, soccer’s wealthiest national division, the number is closer to one in 10.
It’s the result, critics say, of an explosion of money at the top of the sport, riches that allow the wealthiest to buy players from the relatively less rich at a greater rate than ever before. In the latest off-season, for example, Manchester City spent more than 100 million pounds on Raheem Sterling and Kevin de Bruyne, two young attacking players. The players’ former clubs in turn used that windfall to buy talent from rivals.
“Youth academies are going to become obsolete at this rate,’’ said Theo van Seggelen, general secretary of global players union FIFPro. “We need a rethink: we need a model where clubs have a real incentive to develop young players.”
The English Premier League ’s 1 billion pounds bill for player transfers in 2015 made up 40 percent of the global transfer market. Some 65 percent of its spending went toward players from outside of the U.K. The EPL will spend even more money next year following the start of its 5.14 billion pounds ($7.8 billion) television contract, which will deliver an average of 81 million pounds ($123 million) to the league’s 20 teams.
For its part, the Premier League says it remains committed to developing more -- and better -- English players, but that if British kids want to play for the top teams like they ought to step it up. “Ultimately, players have to be good enough and have the right mental attitude, like in all sports, to make it to the elite levels of football,” a league spokesman said in a statement.
Poorer leagues and countries are caught in the tides as well. In Italy and Turkey home-grown talent represented just 9 percent. In only one of the 31 countries surveyed -- Belarus -- number of home-produced players made up more than a third of the roster on first-team squads, according to the researchers.
For the players union, the new research is one more knock on the transfer system, which it is challenging in court, saying it is anti-competitive. “This new report clearly underlines that the transfer system fails one of its five objectives, the training of young players,” van Seggelen said.